[cfarm-users] cfarm108 testing notice

[Bart Van Assche]

On 3/27/26 12:42 PM, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote:
> The challenge in implementing this comes from the fact that we
> have over 1100 users and that the mechanism of implementation
> requires unique, non-overlapping ranges for process identifiers
> while adhering to other system limits and avoiding unnecessary
> resource consumption. This requires a more surgical approach.
It is not clear to me where the requirement for non-overlapping ranges
for process identifiers comes from? Docker should support process (PID)
namespaces, isn't it?

Thanks,

Bart.