[cfarm-users] cfarm108 testing notice
Zach van Rijn
me at zv.io
Fri Mar 27 21:46:13 CET 2026
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche at acm.org>
To: "GCC Compile Farm Users"<cfarm-users at lists.tetaneutral.net>
Cc: "Zach van Rijn"<me at zv.io>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:58:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [cfarm-users] cfarm108 testing notice
> On 3/27/26 12:42 PM, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote:
> > The challenge in implementing this comes from the fact that we
> > have over 1100 users and that the mechanism of implementation
> > requires unique, non-overlapping ranges for process identifiers
> > while adhering to other system limits and avoiding unnecessary
> > resource consumption. This requires a more surgical approach.
> It is not clear to me where the requirement for non-overlapping ranges
> for process identifiers comes from? Docker should support process (PID)
> namespaces, isn't it?
The "rootless" Docker configuration uses namespaces indeed.
The non-overlapping part comes from supporting multiple concurrent users.
More information about the cfarm-users
mailing list