[cfarm-users] Missing "make" on gcc210 or gcc211.fsffrance.org / or wrong autoconf - any idea?

Jonathan Wakely jwakely.gcc at gmail.com
Sat Oct 29 12:32:22 CEST 2022


On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 10:49 Jaroslav Fojtik via cfarm-users, <
cfarm-users at lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote:

> Dear cfarm users,
>
> I have attempted to compile my code on gcc211.
>
> ./configure
> runs well.
>
> But there is some problem, that autoconf macro:
>
> @SET_MAKE@
>
> Does not work properly. It expands to "make", but make is not installed on
> system.
> There is "gmake". May be that this is a wrong configuration of target
> system(s).
>

No, that's how Solaris is supposed to work. Other packages on Solaris
expect the native make (found in the paths Bruno pointed out) so making GNU
Make found in PATH by default would break things.

If your code requires GNU Make, it's up to you to ensure it will be
found/used by adjusting the environment for your configure script, not by
making system-wide changes.



May be that this is a bug of autoconf.
>
> I have attempted to run
>   autoconf
>
> to refresh configure script, but the problem is still here.
>
> May be that something is not configured properly on gcc210 or gcc211?
> Do you have any idea?
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> gcc202 seems to have properly configured make.
>
> thank you very much
>    Jara
>
>
> PS: I need to test on hiendian system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfarm-users mailing list
> cfarm-users at lists.tetaneutral.net
> https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tetaneutral.net/pipermail/cfarm-users/attachments/20221029/163c8b1d/attachment.htm>


More information about the cfarm-users mailing list