[cfarm-users] Future of cfarm186/cfarm187/cfarm188 at OSUOSL

[Simon Josefsson]

Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users <cfarm-users at lists.tetaneutral.net>
writes:

> - option 2: several virtual machines.  Which (multiple) OS would be useful?

For x86 I think a variety of OS is more useful than getting exposure to
x86 CPUs, since x86 is so common anyway.

I would like if some OS on cfarm was a fully free FSDG-compliant OS.

Trisquel which is based on Ubuntu has worked in production use on
x86+ppc64el+arm64 for 2+ years for me with decent load of multiple VM's
with web servers, mail servers and GitLab runners.  Trisquel 11 aramo is
based on Ubuntu 22.04 and is a conservative choice, but there are beta
images of Trisquel 12 based on Ubuntu 24.04 which I'm running on
production hosts for around a month.

/Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1251 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.tetaneutral.net/pipermail/cfarm-users/attachments/20251115/5401b458/attachment.sig>