[cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

[Paul Eggert]

On 2025-01-01 16:32, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote:
> 
> Perhaps a combination of nice(1) and ulimit(1) would be suitable?

Not for mining, no. It would still consume resources that are better 
used for cfarm's intended purposes.


> I would suggest ... making very clear that "mining" for profit is not permitted

That wouldn't suffice, as it's too easy for me to say that I'm not doing 
something for profit, when I get to define "profit". (See what many US 
"nonprofits" do.)